Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. Removal of passive resist bonus on shield/armour hardeners - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Oh dear sweet Satan, they actually went ahead with it! ARGH!
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2013.02.19 13:19:00
|
2. Removal of passive resist bonus on shield/armour hardeners - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
At least I no longer feel guilty for procrastinating and not maxing the Shield Comp Skills. If only I could delete them from my skills list alltogether...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2013.02.09 15:37:00
|
3. CCP IS Sexist - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Abel Merkabah wrote: Tor Gungnir wrote: Abel Merkabah wrote: Solstice Project wrote: Tor Gungnir wrote: Now that's how you troll. You almost sound like you truly believe in what you type. Bravo, Sir. I do ! *lol* This ain't abou...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.09.02 16:25:00
|
4. CCP IS Sexist - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Abel Merkabah wrote: Solstice Project wrote: Tor Gungnir wrote: Now that's how you troll. You almost sound like you truly believe in what you type. Bravo, Sir. I do ! *lol* This ain't about women ... it's about idiots believing that a...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.09.02 15:44:00
|
5. CCP IS Sexist - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Solstice Project wrote: Because whiny bitches like you don't deserve anything. Humans aren't all equal. The lesser ones desperately trying to lower the better ones down to their level does not change that simple fact of nature. Now that'...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.09.02 14:10:00
|
6. Navy naming conventions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jack Tronic wrote: Given a few thousand years in the future EVE takes place in, scorpions and badgers have evolved to fly. But there are no badgers or scorpions in the EVE galaxy.... I guess that the logical explanation would be that the pe...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.09.02 14:08:00
|
7. Navy naming conventions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maybe I should've been more clear. I was thinking of the "USS" in "USS Enterprise". Don't rightly know what that is actually called in military terms...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.09.02 13:54:00
|
8. CCP IS Sexist - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If anything they enforce the stereotype that all men are large and in charge just as much as they force women characters to press their lovelies up against the camera lens.
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.09.02 13:48:00
|
9. Navy naming conventions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
We all know about it, perhaps the most famous being the starship USS Enterprise. Do the in-game navies have any form of well-established naming convention? Perhaps Scrapheap *insert name* for Minmatar Navy?
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.09.02 13:36:00
|
10. CCP IS Sexist - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ivy Romanova wrote: Men get their Forbes 500 Cover Photo Crossed Arm Executive look Carney I OWN THIS PLACE look But all women have is this! I'LL POKE YOUR EYES OUT!! I HAVE BOOBS! Why can't we get the same po...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.09.02 13:21:00
|
11. Increase the challenge of missions. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: t they gave the impression that incursion spawns were completly random when they nerfed them. But i have been guilty of this myself, warp into mission deploy drones walk away. This idea should slow down mission bots a...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.09.02 13:06:00
|
12. Why are NEX clothes gender limited? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
To be fair though, KILTS are the epitome of manliness. Not SKIRTS. KILTS.
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.09.02 11:31:00
|
13. Large ORE Barges/Exhumers - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CorInaXeraL wrote: EVE was never meant to be a 'sit and mine' game. It's Pew-Pews in Space. Hence why there's a massive imbalance of Combat/Recon/Scout/Probe/Kaboom-yo ships to Rockmunchers. Actually it was meant to be a "sit and mine" gam...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.08.30 20:42:00
|
14. Large ORE Barges/Exhumers - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Velicitia wrote: BS is getting a little too silly though. Why exactly is it silly? Industrial stuff tend to get reaaaal big because bigger is usually more efficient.
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.08.30 18:21:00
|
15. Large ORE Barges/Exhumers - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Din Chao wrote: If all you want is different/bigger ships, but with the same yields/ore holds/tanks, I'm all for it. Or alternatively make the ORE ships a bit bigger. Perhaps make Exhumers a tad bit, perhaps 2/3's, bigger than their Barge c...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.08.30 18:20:00
|
16. Bomber cargo hold problem - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
GeeShizzle MacCloud wrote: anyways... wouldnt mind seeing a bomb bay to hold 3 bombs and the cargo size reduce to 140m to possibly accomodate an extra token bomb. that way the t2 will have a space to unload and somewhere to load a different t...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.08.30 18:13:00
|
17. Large ORE Barges/Exhumers - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Shereza wrote: I have a solution to the "I wanna 8 laser mining ship!!!" issue. Fly a rokh. . Because Rohks can fit Barge/Exhumer laz0rs. *thumbsup* And where did I say 8 laz0rs in the first place? I just want bigger ship
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.08.30 18:07:00
|
18. Large ORE Barges/Exhumers - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Hypercake Mix wrote: Ugh. A number of you don't understand the point of the barge changes and a number of you don't understand mining. The barge changes were a part of the Tier-icide effort, the ongoing changes to ships to make them all viable...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.08.30 16:22:00
|
19. Large ORE Barges/Exhumers - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
If you ask me, CCP didn't do things right with the Barge changes. Instead of making the existing Barges so much tougher of a nut to crack, they should've added Battleship-sized Barges/Exhumers. Though I guess doing new models and stuff takes too ...
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.08.30 15:35:00
|
20. Bomber cargo hold problem - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Soundwave wrote: The cargospace I'd spend on bombs always annoyed the **** out of me. How about each Stealth Bomber getting a special "Bomb Hold"?
- by Tor Gungnir - at 2012.08.30 14:16:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |